<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oai2.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-11-10T10:11:19Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:repository.slads.sc.tz:cmsj0f4pp002rk8c56kxcluw0" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://repository.slads.sc.tz/api/oai</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:repository.slads.sc.tz:cmsj0f4pp002rk8c56kxcluw0</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-10T09:59:32Z</datestamp><setSpec>department:RAM</setSpec><setSpec>type:dissertation</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>THE INFLUENCE OF ADEQUATE RECORDS MANAGEMENT ON  STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING: A CASE OF BAGAMOYO DISTRICT  COURT</dc:title><dc:creator>Warda Omari Selemani</dc:creator><dc:subject>Records management</dc:subject><dc:subject>Strategic decision-making</dc:subject><dc:subject>Bagamoyo District Court</dc:subject><dc:subject>Records retrieval and access</dc:subject><dc:subject>Digitisation and computerisation</dc:subject><dc:subject>Storage and space challenges</dc:subject><dc:subject>Case study / Mixed methods research</dc:subject><dc:description>ABSTRACT 
This study assessed the influence of adequate records management on strategic 
decision-making at Bagamoyo District Court. It was guided by four objectives: to 
examine current records management practices, identify their influence on strategic 
decisions, examine the main challenges and suggest strategies for improvement. A 
descriptive case study design and mixed-methods approach were used. The study 
involved 22 participants, consisting of 13 registry and support staff represented in the 
questionnaire results and 9 court administrators and judicial officers represented in 
the interview themes. Quantitative results were analysed through frequencies and 
percentages, while qualitative responses were grouped into themes. The findings 
showed that case numbers, filing years and case types were the main methods used to 
organise files. However, 84.6% rated storage from fair to very poor, and 61.5% 
reported that retrieval normally took at least 15 minutes, more than one hour or 
sometimes failed. A total of 92.3% stated that records management had a significant 
or moderate effect on decisions. Major challenges included inadequate storage space, 
limited computer systems, insufficient filing equipment, weak file tracking and staff 
shortage. Participants supported computerisation, digitisation, better storage, staff 
training and regular records audits. The study concludes that reliable and accessible 
records improve the speed and quality of court decisions. It recommends an 
electronic file index, stronger movement control, gradual digitisation, application of 
retention schedules, improved equipment, training and quarterly audits. The 
numerical results retained from the source report should be checked against the 
completed field instruments before final submission. </dc:description><dc:publisher>School of Library, Archives and Documentation Studies (SLADS)</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:type>Text</dc:type><dc:type>Dissertation</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://repository.slads.sc.tz/records/cmsj0f4pp002rk8c56kxcluw0</dc:identifier><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:relation>https://repository.slads.sc.tz/api/records/cmsj0f4pp002rk8c56kxcluw0/file</dc:relation></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>